[vos-d] Re: Re: Debian packages

[Reed Hedges]

Hi Benjamin. Great news that you can work on the debian packages!

Current development is not yet ready for release, but we won't be doing any file
reorganization I don't think so you could use it to get the packages set up,
maybe we could put up a  "snapshot version" if you want, but once it's ready to
release they'd be ready to go.  

One thing you might notice is that things are divided into a few binary
packages, but could be divided further.  I.e. we oughtto have seperate
packagesfor:

vos-corelibs:
    libvos
    libvutil
    libvip

vos-metaobjects:
    libmetaobject_misc
    libmetaobject_a3dl
    libmetaobject_ircbridge?
    libmetaobject_services?

vos-extensions:
(these would mainly be depended upon by omnivos plugins but should also be
seperately installable for other "server" type programs to use)
    libvosext_fspersist
    libvosext_http
    libvosext_revcontrol
    libvosext_sqlpersist

omnivos

omnivos-plugins: 
(though ones without dependencies could be included with the
omnivos packages I guess)
    omnivos-plugin-avatarfactory: libomniplg_avatar_factory
    omnivos-plugin-fspersist: libomniplg_fspersist
    omnivos-plugin-hypervos: libomniplg_hypervos
    omnivos-plugin-ircbridge: libomniplg_ircbridge ?? 
    omnivos-plugin-logctrl: libomniplg_logctrl
    omnivos-plugin-search: libomniplg_search
    omnivos-plugin-services: libomniplg_services ??
    omnivos-plugin-talkative: libomniplg_talkative

mesh

wxterangreal


This is kind a lot I guess but they are seperate due to dependencies (both
external libraries and within the VOS project).

Reed


On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 02:43:10PM +0800, Lalo Martins wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:09:56 +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> > Would you suggest to package 0.23 or a checkout the current development
> > version (is it stable)? When is 0.24 scheduled to be be released (one of
> > Peters messages suggested at the earliest in Oct.)?
> 
> Current development is certainly not stable yet.
> 
> Isn't 0.23 already packaged though?  :-)  Of course I think you're welcome
> to make any corrections you deem necessary according to current debian
> policies to it, then upload it to Debian.
> 
> > The debian package for bazaar said, that it is no longer maintained
> > upstream, however, bzr-ng did not say such a thing. Is bzr still alive?
> 
> Yes, very alive :-) bazaar-1 (baz) is no longer maintained because focus
> has switched to bazaar-ng (bzr, soon bazaar-2).  Check
> http://www.bazaar-vcs.org/
> 
> best,
>                                                Lalo Martins
> --
>       So many of our dreams at first seem impossible,
>        then they seem improbable, and then, when we summon the will, they
>        soon become inevitable.
> --
> personal:                              http://www.laranja.org/ technical:
>                   http://lalo.revisioncontrol.net/ GNU: never give up
> freedom                 http://www.gnu.org/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vos-d mailing list
> vos-d at interreality.org
> http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d